The Silence Of The Left On Radical Muslim Apartheid

The rare and cringe-worthy appearance of a 70’s inspired feminist is visible these days only along the sidelines of a Pro-Life March; screeching anti-Life diatribes through a bullhorn. Feminists have rigorously dedicated themselves to the crusade of abortion on demand. Consequentially, feminists have become an irrelevant factor on a range of issues in the national debate, all because of their death grip on this solitary platform.

The second, single-issue sideshow award goes to the Homosexual lobby. Gay marriage is the sum total of their agenda and nothing distracts them from this singleness of purpose. The apparent refusal of this particular lobby to speak out against Islamic fascism is a remarkable act of self-restraint because according to Sharia Law, Homosexuals must be killed.

The ‘academy’ also wishes to recognize a newcomer, celebrated by Hollywood itself, none other than the global warming thought police. These anti-debate, global warming folks will also be receiving a special award that recognizes them to be most like the Taliban in their ‘convert or die’ approach to public persuasion.

For some unspeakable, pathological reason, the single-issue ideologues have banned together in a code of silence in face of injustice, murder and terror. Whatever happened to the big, bad feminists? Why aren’t they speaking out against how radical Islam treats women? There’s nothing but dead air; not one single word is uttered against the Islamic fascist apartheid against women and gays. Their silence says it all. . .

A Mad Hatter’s Summer of Events

Like Alice at the Mad Hatter’s tea party, taxpayers have recently been assaulted with many wish-it-weren’t-for-real events that make me watch for the white rabbit. It’s been a Wonderland of events and characters. Among them:

•Queen of Hearts: Nancy Pelosi. Politico recounts how she “whipped” together the votes for Cap and Trade, replacing “off with their heads” with dogged, in-your-face (and perhaps other body parts) persistence. Worried more about her reputation than the content of the bill, witnesses recounted that she and her sidekicks even surrounded one holdout–Rep. Joe Baca–who then (surprise!) voted in favor of Cap and Trade. No wonder Congressman Ciro Rodriguez sprinted like a rabbit out of the House chamber after surprising Pelosi with a “no” vote.. .

Boehner’s Stand

By Nichole Hungerford The problems associated with what is charitably called “Cap and Trade” (but more accurately called “Tax and Regulate”) was capture most succinctly in Congressman Boehner’s halting question, “Is there anything that we’re not regulating in this bill?” Indeed, with the inherent energy requisite for every American-made product, unprecedented Orwellian intrusion into our homes, and millions of jobs to be sacrificed at the alter of climate change, the answer is not optimistic.

Weighing in at approximately 1200 unread pages, it seems as though the final straw for Boehner was the 300 plus page amendment incredibly submitted at 3:09 am the morning before the historic vote took place. Fortunately, the univocal outrage over this subterfuge found voice in the gentleman from Ohio following the narrow passage of the bill. Boehner used the opportunity afforded to the Minority Leader of the House to express an extended remonstrance on behalf of not just his party, but the jilted American public, who may soon find themselves yoked under this uniquely Californian quagmire.